Technology Analysis
The analysis assesses several IT applications used by Wigglesworth Hospital Trust (WHT) based on their criticality to the information system (IS), technical quality, ITA usage, and user perception value (UPV). The analysis focuses on the applications' performance, satisfaction levels, and their contribution to duplicated systems.
The analysis identifies the PAS system as a critical application with high ratings in BSSV (5.000) and PBSP (1.892), indicating satisfactory performance. On the other hand, Bluespier, which delivers the same service as PAS, has poor performance based on a negative UPV rating (-0.52). It is recommended to replace Bluespier with the PAS system, considering its obsolescence.
In the context of Schedule supplies, Equidox (UPV = 2.03) outperforms Bluespier (UPV = 0.55), and both applications deliver the same service. It is suggested to remove Bluespier and replace it with Equidox to reduce duplicated systems and centralize data more efficiently.
For the Check Blood business service, Moblood (UPV = 2.032) outperforms both Medilab (UPV = 2.032) and Haematopsys (UPV = 2.032). Redeveloping Moblood is recommended to improve its performance, while removing Haematopsys as a duplicated application. Upgrading Moblood would require £5,300 and an increase in the number of users to 112. Providing a 3G phone or tablet could enhance its usability for staff.
The application Medilab, reaching its user limits and having high maintenance costs, is suggested to be outsourced. Outsourcing Medilab can help WHT focus on other business situations, improve efficiency, and gain a competitive advantage.
The analysis also examines the satisfaction levels of the Perform elective surgery and Check Blood services, with PAS and Moblood receiving positive ratings. Equidox, despite a poor PBSP rating (1.328) in other services, gains user confidence with a UPV of 2.03 for its IT application.
Considering the cost analysis, managing the six applications costs approximately £801,600 annually. However, after removing duplicated applications based on the analysis, the cost reduces to £504,900 annually. The cost reduction represents a decrease of approximately 37%. The overall investment by WHT in these applications amounts to £3.095 million, covering acquisition costs, maintenance, and usage licenses. The average cost of usage and maintenance per user is £642 and £70, respectively.
Please note that the information provided in the analysis assumes certain assumptions and excludes certain costs, such as outsourcing charges and upgrading Equidox.
